Category Archives: The Long and the Short of It

Corrosively Criptical


I want to do so many things and I have so many ideas, still at my age, if anything, I have more-they are undone. I want to do big, great things. It is like when you watch a movie and some part of it takes you away somewhere else, and you watch that movie to go to that place, as a form of escapism-I don’t always watch movies over and over-but a few I do-then one day, you have watched it so much, and you know exactly at what part you reach that nirvana, and it is over too soon, too fleeting, and you suddenly realize that it is not real. It is not your life, you are not the one getting away, and you need to do something like that, but you need to do it. Not watch it.

I switch from books to media, to music, to puzzles, to writing, to doing, but I always have to do so much to keep my mind sharp, that I do not really just put everything down and do things. For one reason, when you get out of school, you have to work-you do not get to read as many books, write as much, or make art as much, because you have to work. The period in which you are expected to do something, or show you can do something so that you will be picked to do more somethings is very short in school, and if you view life as having to be decided upon before you  mature, then not only is their more chance for you to change your mind about what you really wanted to do, or find out what that is, but also it decreases the number of people educated enough to do anything important. In other words, more education is better.

It takes years of practice to do anything really, really well. Short of perverse genius, some people who are picked to do things based on childish endeavors continue to produce nothing of consequence, whereas, someone who might not have had time to develop into greatness doesn’t get the chance.  Other times it is the person who is pinched (Nureyev, Makarova) that has the drive and ambition to make it and be better than anyone else. I do not think there should be an imaginary window or so much pressure to be picked to be someone’s muse at an early age. A dancer develops into an artist or they don’t, but it takes TIME. I think the lack of truly great artists has a lot to do with the pressure on young students to get somewhere, and be something, before they have had time to develop into anything, leaving them feeling flattened if they don’t do something quick. Yes, this happens to so many people, and I think it retards or stops people from studying dance for longer. “If I haven’t become this by such and such a day,” is nonsense. Surely, people do, but becoming great with all the opportunity in the world, all the gifts and all the right teaching, doesn’t happen often, and if it does at all, it is through years of continuing to develop, actually. I do not think greatness can be measured in ones so young or that it should be expected of them. And one thing all great dancers do have in common is that they don’t quit!

I told my friend today, again, “the sky’s the limit!” It should be and you choose your words very carefully with children to encourage all of them to do their best, and no child should be out of the running. Some of us are very conscious of that, as educators, and parents ARE educators, but somehow, some educators (teachers) even parents, are not. An elitist program can be a problem, but there are dancers who now currently have more talent, but one day, many other dancers will “catch up.” I am for more opportunities for all dancers to do that, one way or the other. I think if more money was spent by parents, and other people with money, on improving children’s chances of learning to dance, get them off the street, out of their cafe lifestyles and into a path of discipline and increased self-esteem, respect for the arts, there would be more and better dancers, opportunities for those who are professionals looking for work, and more tickets bought by ballet aficionados to ballet performances because they would not be adverse to going. An example is my son, age 27, who will sit through a ballet performance because he took class for a few months and respects the hard work. Everyone in ballet takes something away from it, whether they are a new parent helping for the first time at a backstage show, or an usher who gets to watch all the performances, or a cinematographer who is rapt by the precision, sweat and myriad imagery to capture and relate. Everyone is pleasantly surprised by ballet and dance. Surprised to find they like it.

Despite efforts of people to make art with ballet, preserve the integrity and meaning of its movements, teaching, choreography, costumes, in different periods of history, ballet breaks down. Like a car on the road it needs a tow, a repair, maybe a rehaul, to bring it back onto the road and getting the attention or use it deserves. There are constant discussions about ballet and a legion of fans across the world and yet how many actual dance performances can you say you viewed this year in person. anything done for or in the field of ballet, requires notation, the libretto, the photos, the video, the distribution, everything, because it is an art of the moment. Dance. But in order to expose yourself to art, you can walk out on any Thursday night in most beach towns and get a glimpse of it, you can hear music, taste food, wear fashion, and reading material abounds, but dance you have to sit through and watch and go see. You have to go to the theater to do this and like a live performance of music-nothing compares. It is okay to watch it on tv, Vimeo, YouTube, in theaters on enormous screens, but it is eminently better and more exciting to sit in a seat (any seat) at the theater and watch ballet being performed live. It, after having been to the theater, will enable you to get up out of your seat and start to dance, and suddenly, watching dancers perform live, you realize it is real, and necessary and important.

One of the most important aspects of education, being an educator, is putting aside the customary snobbery that might accompany considering oneself an expert on something, vastly experienced,  knowledgeable or wise and give one’s students the benefit of the doubt, equal opportunity, and chances, repeatedly to prove themselves, opportunity to improve, and practice. The bad get better, but they can also learn other things. I have learned from being able to do things, or not being able to do things is always a state of mind, frequently. The handicapped can learn from dance, the geek, the tomboy, the football player, the debutante, the delinquent. And in a supportive environment these children can be taught to dance correctly, to work hard, to see aspects of art like line, symmetry, and composition, that they would otherwise not be able to comprehend at all, through an activity that most of them can never consider boring. They also learn discipline, social graces, about music, costume, stage design, choreography, scenery, acting, and it can lead many of them to pursue careers in the arts which are supportive of the expressive movements, whether it be acting, film, tv, dance, music, etc. There is art in everyone and a need to express themselves. It is always the best part of me, and the most intimate, which I bring to a choreographed work, and to be able to compel and persuade, and enliven, invigorate, and reach people through a performing arts medium is most gratifying and rewarding. It affirms in us that we are individuals and this is a lifelong self-esteem booster. it can be what gets a fat man off the couch at age thirty when he has let himself dissipate, or a woman, in remembering what he felt like working hard and creating in dance. It can be continued throughout life, and dancers age, but they can keep right on dancing, just like pregnant women.

But in the beginning of any growth of a movement must be organization and structure, and big, BIG thinking, to get an idea off the ground. it can be deflated if enough energy is not instilled into it, or if enough belief is not created, and that makes promoting it and perpetuating it a big job, too. Lots of people have worked hard in that field and created good shows, but they have lost their momentum, believing it need to build, grow, but without resources, it can’t. It is human energy which makes all things grow, and life needs to be imbued into the substance of a thing to get the ball rolling and the energy expended to propel it in any given direction. Without the interest, dedication and true spirit of invention involved there is no momentum, no human energy. So in order to speed things up, get the ball rolling, you have to excite people. There is no point in flogging a dead horse or dealing with people who do not share your vision exactly. They will hold you back, prevent that energy from multiplying and creating the momentum necessary to catapult the vision or dream into the atmosphere and into tangible presence-reality. Without the big bang, or a ton, of life and energy, our people, environment and planet would not have been created, and it is exactly that which can be taught in the studio of a ballet class, things can happen and do, but it is not all about a defined end result, sometimes the energy happened in the process, develops, and momentum of each individual is nurtured by their teacher. A lot of little pops eventually produces a big pop and competition is essential-not negative, debasing, and judgmental competition, but life, energy and momentum, better and better and better! So it is important to stop thinking sometimes and just dance, try, and imagine what the possibilities can be for all children in dance and by each of those children themselves to be allowed to dream, because you never know where the momentum is going to come from. Diaghilev said he could not dance a bit, but he was inspired to take dance to a level the world had never before experienced it, and it was not just the dancers of the New York City Ballet that made those first shows and created that company, it was the patrons and subscribers who came to see ballet inserted between acts of vaudevillian fare, who simply learned to appreciate ballet by exposure to it, and in the same way, when you put a group of children in a room to teach them dance, kinetics occur and develop, which grows upon them and movement ensues, through which they learn to appreciate art in all its forms, and expression and communication. Simple physics really. Mass x velocity. No conservation! Does anyone want to stand in the way of the force of that collision? Keep on dancing!

 

Dance festival honors Jacques d’Amboise – The Orange County Register


Past event archived August, 2013

 

Dance festival honors Jacques d’Amboise – The Orange County Register.

▶ ‘Parade’ (1917) — The Ballets Russes Cubist Work – YouTube


▶ ‘Parade’ (1917) — The Ballets Russes Cubist Work – YouTube.

Dancer Jacques d’Amboise on Balanchine’s Life and Death


Dancer Jacques d’Amboise Describes ‘How The Arts Can Change Lives’ | Here & Now.

NYIBC Announcement to Cease Operations-Read It and WEEP


NYIBC Announcement.

Shakespeare’s Plays Are a Natural Fit With Dance


Shakespeare’s Plays Are a Natural Fit With Dance – NYTimes.com.

Gracie’s Story-South Coast Conservatory


Gracie’s Story – YouTube.

NOT JUST FOR PLEASURE with Alina Cojocaru


NOT JUST FOR PLEASURE with Alina Cojocaru | Watch Facebook Videos – Download – Share.

▶ (1/4) Я – балерина. Т. ВЕЧЕСЛОВА – YouTube


▶ (1/4) Я – балерина. Т. ВЕЧЕСЛОВА – YouTube.

▶ The Prima Ballerina Tatiana Vecheslova in 1951 in St.Petersburg.wmv – YouTube


▶ The Prima Ballerina Tatiana Vecheslova in 1951 in St.Petersburg.wmv – YouTube.

▶ Monica Loughman’s The Children of Lir (Work in progress) New York City – YouTube


▶ Monica Loughman’s The Children of Lir (Work in progress) New York City – YouTube.

 

untitled


No one can seem to find my book. It is posted in the drop-down section on the top of the Home Page, under Book. But even my daughter said she could not “find” it because the tweets that went out were titled “private”. That is because I used those links to tag the pages only. The fact is you cannot promote a PAGE on WordPress. Yes, it’s true. I am thinking about whether to bind it and sell it, sell digitalized sections, like on itunes, or just give it away and ask for donations. It is a pretty good little book for all that. I wrote it for my daughter. I am sorry about that, as it appears to confuse people, but WordPress is not perfect. It is a little history of ballet (to be followed by more), but it is encapsulated into a small number of pages of information for the busy reader, and not one who has time to devour a 700 page books on the shadings of the history of ballet.

I am very wary of one source that everyone can go to for a thing anyway. It never works out, as it is all one person’s perspective of the thing and you could read several perspectives and get a more objective opinion by picking and choosing your authors. For years there was one book of art history, for example, Horst W. Jansen’s ART HISTORY. When I went to NYU, it was read in two parts in two semesters by every student: art history, art, or as an elective by just about anyone. My art teacher told me this before going to college, so I bought the book (I was always buying up books-which all of my mates have found to be a nuisance when moving) in a nearly demolished condition and read it. I could have taken the AP test at the time, but avoided art history after that assiduously, and took other art history course with more relish, fin de siecle, architecture, Japanese, John Berger, perspective and other antiquated texts by famous and not-so famous Italian artists-my own perspective and not one shared by a group, after which you all know the same thing, make comparisons using the same jumping off point, like evolution, or the bible. Perhaps there is another explanation, if only we pause to think.

I went to galleries, and made art, and as I had already read my mother’s college textbooks on art history as a child, these images were all familiar to me. There is another way of having information drummed into you, like falling asleep during infomercials, when you are married to someone who will not turn off the tv! Even today, I find myself suddenly saying “Oh, Diane!”, doing various aerobic exercises suddenly and having a strange fascination and compulsion for ordering anything As Seen On TV. Some things stay with you, and no matter how you may try to shake them, they will not go away. This, is a very dangerous thing in art and religion. It causes people to make art just like other people, and to repeat things nonsensically, even wars.

In art, seeing the art, reading the details, and making the art are the only requirements. One definitely does not have to have knowledge of art history to make art. One can just do it. Literature is nearly the same. In fact, if one reads too much, I am of the opinion, that their art will take on naturally acquired elements of other masterpieces, other voices, and who is not guilty of looking at another person on the dance floor, whether to compare oneself to them or to copy their moves? Who says they are right? Inspired, original? Being inspired by the painter next to you is different, as the expressionists, impressionists, and other masters inspired each other, they stole, and that is occurring all the time in music as well. It may only be copied because it is popular/is selling. But every period of great art is preceded by an artist who sets or leads that genre or faction. In a sense, he (because it was always a he) was the true initiator of the style, and even so, no one often has considered that until history is put down. So there are some things you have to find in books. It makes the understanding of development easier and you know who did what, unless they argue, such as with Morse and his code, or the Italian gentleman (what’s his name?), or a dictionary-to get the word right.

And people were so busy arguing about that, at the time, that they forgot completely that Morse was a painter of some renown, an academician, and many other things, but a painter first. Although his painting were not very painterly, he used art as a means of communication, like words, diagrams. He caught an essence of something that would otherwise have been missed. He taught at NYU and painted many paintings before developing that code. His painting of the Louvre sold for about $2,000,000, I think, and was exhibited at the gallery I worked at at NYU. Grey. We had to post a guard so nobody touched it. Of course everyone wants to touch things, to connect with the artist….who was dead. But nevertheless, people reached out and boop! another fingerprint on the masterpiece (?). But without people, even dumb ones, being disposed to connect with art, there would not be any, no need for it. The fact that even ignorant people want to connect with art should say something. A picture is worth a thousand words.

So music and the other arts would seem to follow, I learned in this way, and to find the progenitor of a style of music might be easy at the time, but quickly is lost again in the many productions that follow in an effort to capitalize on the success of that thing. This is business-not to be confused with art. It is archivists and djs, mostly, who are able to tell us which came first and make that an interesting tableau for their programs, books and lecture tours. But there is such a thing as a bad dj, producer, etc. Usually they tend to put things in the wrong order. We want to be led along, told a story, shown a tableau, experience a symphony, be moved by the moving and spoken to by the articulate. We want to be dumb. That is a source of business. A demand?What is it with people who call themselves something and fail to move us to the adjudicated point? It is rarely worth it to pay the price of admission to find out and only be disappointed again. I know a lot of dancers but would pay only to see certain ones perform, because I feel they have no statement to make, and I want to be entertained-forget. Be dumb. I am the woman in the mint commercial, being blown by a minty wind. carried away by Calgon, and Yule Gibbons, munching on that branch. Things I cannot do, like politics, I want done for me. That is why I am paying X amount of dollars to be carried away.

What would we do without them? Listen to the music. Look at the art. Watch the dancing. Life goes on and in it we have a few moments, sometimes more in which we are extremely lucky to be part of something bigger than ourselves, a herald of a new event, a new vision, something fresh, inspirational, memorable. Monumental. Big. I have seen a few big things and knew they would be big, remembered, permanent. But not many, a few. I keep looking for new things. In ballet, as in music, and art, it is the public opinion that counts. It is the listening to the music that other people have often put before us, making themselves a necessary evil, in order to get a percentage of that product going out the door, take some responsibility for its success and demands rewards, or a part of the pie. Whether anyone involved in the selling of these products admits it or not, theirs is a percentage-based endeavor and has nothing whatsoever to do with the art. It has to do with their greed usually, their ego always, and their own motives without a doubt. Almost never! has it to do with just being a part of something historically important, useful or necessary to carry on art.

A presenter is important to artists, who so often fail at business tasks, as they are busy becoming good at their art, learning to play their instruments, draw and paint, make films, dance, choreograph. Whatever they do, if they are good enough at it, they must totally devote themselves to the perfection of it and virtually nothing else. How else could they become great artists? Sometimes it is because of the presenter only that we too see these events, witness this spectacle or brush this greatness. Usually, this is lost in the the minds of the individuals rapt in awe at their opportunity, their self-importance, their luck. They never see the presenter, or think of him/her, they remember the art, but not the reason they saw it, why they had that opportunity, ot how it all came together. That is magic then, sort of, isn’t it? Like the great oz behind the scenes, but not really doing it for his own gratification, but rather creating something bigger out of smaller parts, a show, something to remember in life that was truly amazing, a standout, history.

Well, these days I do not think a lot of them are.

 

 

Dancing ballerina skeleton pinpoints injury hotspots – health – 18 February 2014 – New Scientist


Dancing ballerina skeleton pinpoints injury hotspots – health – 18 February 2014 – New Scientist.

Want some ideas for old pointe shoes?


Pointe magazine – Ballet at its Best..

Were Margot Fonteyn and Rudolf Nureyev secret lovers? | Mail Online


Were Margot Fonteyn and Rudolf Nureyev secret lovers? | Mail Online.